Tiziana Paghini
This is the news of the day. Gd. Weber offers a kind of cut from 10,000 € to those in Germany demonstrate that the animals are treated with kid gloves and do not stop to vivisection or God knows where and for what purposes. This is the video posted on Youtube, then No nonsense that we have opponents who, with good reason, we do not agree with the expatriation of the creatures for our shores entirely obscure. We, accused of ignorance, not to see beyond our nose aristocrat, dare to do the flea market this wonderfully profitable ... Ten thousand euro ... What can I say? This is the current price for a good witness? Now the evidence has a market value? Come on, did not know ... is it true that you should be able to live a thousand lives to learn everything, and perhaps would not be enough! They are all so sure of their position in the Olympus of the gods by having to give money to a sacred truth? I do not think so, or rather, I try to explain. If I knew that in a strange place - out of the Motherland-Italian animals were treated well, but really good, I would not need to pocket the size in question. And believe me, € 10,000 are comfortable for anyone, but I do not wish, as well as refuse to accept a reward if I were to find a lost animal. Santa is? No! Simply never been for sale and never will be. This is a very low rung of the men, and perhaps, as a fierce beast in my turn, I would not even think of accepting it. The truth has a 'very big money, you know know, but not commensurate with the base money. Jesus, but we realize certain things? As the daughter of working class and proud of it, mi è stato insegnato che i valori etici e morali non sono in vendita! Se un fatto può essere avvalorato da vera testimonianza, e con questa s'intente nome e cognome, oltre che luogo di appartenenza di un soggetto, per quale ragione offrire denaro?
Un approccio, quello del Sign. Weber, a mio avviso molto discutibile ed arbitrario, in quanto se ciò che afferma dovesse essere verità, offrendo una somma simile, ci scommetto quello che volete che a decine si presenteranno a dire che all'estero, destinazione di troppi animali italiani, c'è il paradiso in terra, questo è poco ma sicuro.
Non sarebbe più giusto, oltre che semplice, testimoniare il vero con nomi e cognomi degli adottanti? Dove sussisterebbe il problema implementation of something that, in event, should be inescapable truth? After all, would be many more than myself, to be interested in seeing for yourself what seems to be so sure but that, on balance, there seems to be supported by nothing except the words of certain associations twinned with countries' Alps! Too bad these are just words and nothing more. And if it is true that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty, the fact remains that, until proven itself where there are no palpable certainty, everything is and will remain a big question with no way back.
Translated in simple terms, Sign. Weber, she takes us-obviously not the only person to have physical evidence and no doubt ...- miserable sizes from Far West, and we might find dialogue. Otherwise, as is clear, silent, and there will always be a great figure!
Further translated, this is further proof that collides with a hyperbolic number of animals and Italian, to destinations very, very uncertain.
Ah, but I forgot what some willing volunteer I have already noted that careless ... I am! We draw from sources without knowledge of the facts only, and not because we are fighting on the front but only because, not knowing how to bring evening, baste absurd plots on the PC.
And if they say that the 'trench' there are, will no doubt be true ...
O no?
Tiziana Paghini
Un padrone che li accudisce e li ama? Ebbene, dov'è il problema nel dire che si è adottato un cane o un gatto? E' un segreto di Stato?
0 comments:
Post a Comment